Whilst there is an opinion suggesting that only tutee should be allowed to enter at the universities who are obtaining high level of scores, others advocate that the chance of getting higher education should be associated with all student with different educational background. There are compelling reasons on both sides of the contentious topic which will be discussed in detail, followed by my own take on the matter.
On the one hand, there are those reasoning that universities are a cornerstone of the flourishing ability of talented students where can lay a suitable groundwork in order to nurture their innate capabilities. To put it differently, inextricably intertwined with other aspects of individuals competence, it is believed the universities to be dedicated to all-around students who have an admirable educational background. This is amply illustrated by the fact that the more acceptance of high levelled pupils are bound to appear, the more competitive atmosphere would be depicted which leads to enhancing the ranking of the university as a result of hardcore competitions among tutees and eventually achieving brilliant accomplishments. Take Harvard and Oxford Universities as the most obvious patently example; impressive background of students singing up give rise a brilliant feedbacks in those universities which rest them between the most reputed educational centers universality. This in turn foster students to have gravitated towards more scientific qualifications.
On the other hand, the opposing views assert that in order to make headway toward the betterment of the educational system it is better to give ample opportunities to all people to improve their skills. The most axiomatic argument is that the vast majority of students are simultaneously working and studying. simply put, such labourer students in the early years have no choice but working in exchange for studying brought about by ailing economy. They have no time to promote themselves and prove their innate and efforts. If the current policy does not allow them to pursue their tertiary education, they are set to fail to find an opportunity to show their performances and efficiencies.
To conclude, although it could be accounted some valid arguments on both sides of the controversy, it is my firm conviction that tertiary education's right should be apportioned to the publicity with various background and not be assigned to a specific type of people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gher education should be associated with all student with different educational b...
^^
Line 3, column 879, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'feedback'?
Suggestion: feedback
...udents singing up give rise a brilliant feedbacks in those universities which rest them b...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Simply
...re simultaneously working and studying. simply put, such labourer students in the earl...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2083.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42447916667 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14377066587 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575520833333 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.2877929243 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.230769231 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5384615385 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.30769230769 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255633799574 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760470802167 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661626346898 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149713606781 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05702049535 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.75 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.