A number of children are provided by their parents and never have any unmet demands. In my viewpoint, there is an array of good parenting style which does not support this type of parenting owing to a cascade of compelling negative long-term effects.
To begin with, offsprings' upbringing is rested on the shoulders of parents as the main objective of the parenting role. More specifically, in order to develop children's' self-controlled, parents should take some boundaries and regulation. That is to say, these constraints in demands and actions for children in early age contribute to be gravitated toward confidence, capability and respectful about the limitations in their during adulthood. Hence, if this is implemented, children will turn gradually into responsible and well-behaved persons not only as a family member but also as a citizen.
On the other hand, there would be a variety of consequences due to indulgent parenting style. Having lenient parent cause the children becoming unable to take decisive action on a momentous occasion. These children are likely to lose their recognition in a dilemma and remain at a bay. Moreover, teeming with teamwork, children are highly unlikely to match themselves as a team member and cope with it as a result of self-centering. This attitude prevents them from abiding by some restrict code in teamwork since they have lived with any boundaries.
In conclusion, it is believed that nurturing children underscores the important role of parents, some of the parents tend to spoil their children throughout removing their boundaries and regulations on children's actions and demands.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...erscores the important role of parents, some of the parents tend to spoil their children th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, as a result, in my view, to begin with, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35135135135 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06940822092 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6138996139 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8598899043 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420396255269 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140562603175 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606299104272 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257183500852 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214139193342 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.