Some people think that economic development is the only way to end world poverty and hunger, while others argue that economic development is damaging the environment and need to stop. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Whether economic development should be deemed as a way of poverty relief or deterioration of the environment has evolved as a heated contentious topic in some societal gatherings. Despite the arguments expressing the substantial role of economic development in poverty tackling and hunger, I am more convinced the environmental degradation should be taken into consideration.
To commence with, those who place a great emphasis on economic progression for poverty relief point to the significance of employment prospects, resulting to reduce the possibility of people's joblessness. This may mean that economic progression is woven tightly with economic vitality in all societies, meaning that the more society develops economically, the more people are affluent. A good illustration of this is clearly delineated by Japan eradicating poverty through economic development after World War II. Increasing economic vitality, therefore, in itself, is bound to be a key factor in eliminating poverty and hunger throughout the world.
Turning to the environmental outlook, it seems environmental degradation can be categorized to be of first importance when it comes to the effect of economic development. Simply put, the cornerstone of economic development is highly likely to lay the foundation for erecting new infrastructures such as factories and firms, requiring more human activities. In such situations, the argument goes that more activities human engage, the more damaging pollutant particle they emit, thereby impinging damage on the biosphere. Take contaminated rainwater run-off as an example; such water enters the water cycle, through transferring by water tables into aquifers, stream and rivers while water remained tainted for so long. this, in turn, has a profoundly deleterious gave impact on the environment by poisoning drinking water and drought.
To conclude, while acknowledging the crucial role of economic development in eliminating poverty, I would embrace that its side-effects are considerably destructive on the biosphere owing to pollutant particles emitting on the atmosphere.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 719, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ile water remained tainted for so long. this, in turn, has a profoundly deleterious ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, may, so, therefore, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33224401209 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606451612903 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.5360502544 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.833333333 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26796096252 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100477128269 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582262993124 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164209653624 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672212067604 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 50.2224549098 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.