While a number of people underscore the importance of the development of a prosperous job as a prime candidate for paying attention, others advocate that the family and friends should lay in the first priority. There are compelling arguments on both sides of this contentious topic which will be discussed in detail, followed by my own take on the matter.
On the one hand, the main reason on the basis of justifying a job development is that the economic circumstances are bound to be a cornerstone of a flourishing family thereby affecting all aspects of one's life. To put it differently, inextricably intertwined with other aspects of an individual's success, career expansion is believed to be of central importance in society and the job market. This just as the only tip of the iceberg because a job development is often accounted for measuring success from the social and personal perspective. Therefore, all such thing provides stakeholders with is a sense of social and personal promoting.
On the other hand, although job prosperities are determining factors when personal achievements are concerned, cherishing family and friends are by no means negligible. Simply put, the more family members expend ample time on together, the more the family bond prove stronger and the members take their advantages from an appropriate environment in favour of intellectual and psychological health. A healthy society stems from a healthy family as a whole. A good illustration of this is a child growing in a warm family where not suppressing regularly. This child would be highly likely to turn into a constructive and influential citizen.
To conclude, there are some valid arguments to be drawn to this controversy I firmly assert that the role of family and friends should be highlighted over the developing a victorious job which. This is mainly because the family and friend formed our personality on intellectual capacity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...family thereby affecting all aspects of ones life. To put it differently, inextricab...
^^^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ly intertwined with other aspects of an individuals success, career expansion is believed t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19488817891 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11645252367 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555910543131 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1102315626 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.076923077 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84615384615 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158254044688 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505974429757 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470497794877 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0968964283816 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388602193932 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.