A number of psychologists subscribe to the belief that spending time on doing nothing activity contributes to overcome anxiety. These interpretations can provide us with insights into the importance of tackling stress and anxiety. I completely agree with the given assertion on the basis of a multitude of compelling reasons.
To begin with, the most patently obvious reason is that getting involved in doing nothing might give rise a recharge and refresh in people. Simply put, inextricably intertwined with other aspects of one's performance, it arguably seems that being recharge and refresh is a central importance to effective efficiency. Take a jacuzzi full of hot water as a restorative tool for example; it would be a wonderful recreational facility to relax and calm. Equally, all such meditations and wasteful activities provide people with is a clear mind from internal and external detrimental factors and thoughts.
In addition to this, another rational approach that should be taken into consideration is that curbing the use of technological devices such as smartphones, laptop and TV etc. People's lifestyle has revolutionized due to technology development and advancement thereby bombarding constantly people's mind and their thought with unpleasant and susceptible information. The more the sensory information is of sights of tension and anxiety, the more the individuals experience a level of burnout, therefore impinging on people's thought in term of increasing the distress rate. Eliminating these devices are bound to be a rewarding solution as well.
To recapitulate, personally I believe that an occasional pause of all preoccupations during a day might be a plausible cure to remedy the stress and reap a stress-free life for a while.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...volved in doing nothing might give rise a recharge and refresh in people. Simply put, inex...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...cably intertwined with other aspects of ones performance, it arguably seems that bei...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47985347985 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24847506792 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630036630037 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1333714009 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.666666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107742811067 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391496551665 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579978856023 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0721680171273 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727381112075 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.