People are calling into question the ethics of exploiting animals. While some advocate the idea that human beings have the right to employ animals to meet their manifold needs, others dismiss them as a complete immoral abuse. Both sides of the argument present rational ideas, which will be elaborated.
On the one hand, supporters of anthropocentric approaches assert that the benefits accruing from animals are by no means negligible. To begin with, since the population is on the rise, their required food is as well as increased which ought to be supplied by breeding animals like cow, pig and hen. Moreover, from their point of view, being the most intelligent creature, have been allowed them to use other fauna for conducting medical researches. The good illustration of this is that a newly invented drug is no prescribed to patients unless it has been tested on rats or monkeys in laboratories. This, in turn, has a far-reaching positive impact on human performance in multifarious medical perspective and affecting on various aspects of their life.
On the other hand, others put forward the argument that these activities are completely violated animals' rights by nature. The most compelling justifying their assertion is that animals have created as mankind and have the right to live free. In other words, it would be no ethical that people put pressure on animals to obey their justified and desirable rule. For instance, a dog which has been forced to walk by two legs is laid under pressure because this animals usually walk on four hand and legs and it is an obvious violence to rights animal.
To conclude, there are logical points on both sides; however, I am of the opinion that animals should not be sacrificed for sake of selfish human. Instead of hunting and killing animals or using them as a laboratory sample, people can follow the vegetarian diet which its advantages are proved. This is mainly because animals get the opportunity to stay alive instead of getting involved in becoming food and conducting medical research for people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 456, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...two legs is laid under pressure because this animals usually walk on four hand and l...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, as well as, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04081632653 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66387122672 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577259475219 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1473915441 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.266666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352050100901 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108174322467 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621780511425 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209400862892 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365986876756 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.