Whether under-18-offenders should reserve their sentences or be educated has evolved as a heated topic of controversy. While I consent to the constructive impact of punishment, I opine that they should be educated as well.
One the one hand, the highly presumably reason is the issue of a deterrent effect of punishment, whereby young offenders possibility would not become the potential criminals. This means that if juvenile delinquents do not encounter the result of what they do, it is highly likely, the criminal activity will be repeated, leading to a malicious crime eventually. A good illustration of this is clearly delineated by shoplifting done by young criminals. This is a where that punishment can play a useful part to curb the young offenders to not fall prey to criminal activities later on. Therefore, in order to tackle such petty crime committed by delinquents, the penal system should sentence them through fine and community services. This, in itself, may lay the groundwork for becoming actual law-abiding citizens.
On the other hand, punishment is not the only viable factor in this respect. Another paramount alternative is delivering educational programmes to educate minutiae of the existing law. To put it differently, it is believed that educational programmes are bound to be a keystone of behaviour based on codes of conduct, thereby absorbing the ground rules in society by perpetrators. Furthermore, the more a young offender is forewarned about his/her consequent doing, the less he/ she commit a crime or become involved in habitual criminals. This, in turn, to those who commit the crime and show little respect for the legal system might make a somehow differences to rehabilitate.
To conclude, regarding acknowledging the substantial role of punishment and education with references to criminals under 18, I would embrace that both of these alternatives possess a quality worthwhile aiming for obviating deep-rooted criminal activity among young children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'offenders'' or 'offender's'?
Suggestion: offenders'; offender's
...ent effect of punishment, whereby young offenders possibility would not become the potent...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: MORE_A_JJ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'a more young'?
Suggestion: a more young
...ciety by perpetrators. Furthermore, the more a young offender is forewarned about his/her co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 484, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'commits'.
Suggestion: commits
.../her consequent doing, the less he/ she commit a crime or become involved in habitual ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41214057508 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16366532475 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619808306709 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9513606901 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277708874876 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869381104495 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676979112361 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166315221544 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070621258695 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.