Some people say it is a good idea for all employees to wear a uniform at work To what extent do you agree or disagree

There is an opinion asserting that it is not imperative to dress a uniform at the workplace. This interpretation provides us with insights into the role of the uniform at the job. I, however, completely disagree with the given assertion on the basis of a multitude of rational reasons.

To begin with, the most axiomatic perspective that should be taken into consideration is that personal safety and immunity. To put it differently, inextricably intertwined with other aspects of proficient, it is believed that uniforms play a vital role to protect staff in their workplace. For instance, in associating with high risky jobs, employees have enforced to wear protective attires to keep them safe from hazardous events and jeopardy just like firemen. Along with this, employees who wear such uniforms have highly likely experienced a sense of unity and belonging. This, in turn, gives rise employees to have gravitated towards more productivity and oneness.

In addition to those notices above, dressing the uniform could be under investigation from the social point of view as well. Simply put, workers in their workplace are bound to be evaluated regardless of their financial status when they wear unit attire. This tendency has a ripple effect on not only their performance at the job but also keep their self-esteem. They would consider themselves as a member of the firm in which they would be appreciated by their performance, skills and capability. Even more, the unity leads to workers to become much more well-mannered and make a friendly atmosphere in their workplace.

To conclude, I strongly hold the viewpoint that uniforms act as a crucial part of the workplaces which have a far-reaching effect on the conservation of human safety against incidents as well as rising a sense of unity and belonging to a department.

Votes
Average: 9.6 (3 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, for instance, in addition, as well as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16053511706 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98162363978 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602006688963 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0795644116 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.214285714 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107329656334 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398383761472 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0318628088876 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0643907420367 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365742348158 0.056905535591 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.