In the past photography was used to real people and place, however, because of technology you can not trust what you see.
Is it a positive or negative development?
Once reliable and trustworthy photography is now unreliable and invalid thanks to the advances in technology. Although this type of new changes can be deemed as a positive development, various negative ones stem from this too.
Those who place a great emphasis on the positive development of photography point to the need for next-generation by which they are able to be in touch with their own ancestors. This is proved that taking new approaches such as photo shop and edit play a substantial role in manipulating pictures, leading to keeping the most parts of our civilization alive past through generations. A good illustration of this is clearly delineated by Achaemenids dynasty located in Iran. This type of positive development in photography industry allows people to keep their history alive and to the youth make a good connection with their 2500 years civilization past through centuries.
On the other hand, this does not mean that negative aspect should be ignored. Deception and forgery are among the main elements which firmly endorses the viewpoint that recent approaches in photography might be undependable. To put it another way, through the distortion of reality can virtually alter the result of something, thereby making troublesome in large-scale in some cases. For example, if a distorted picture reveals race discrimination action by the police force, it tends to make a riot and chaos in society. This in itself might be an effective factor closely linked to anarchy in a country.
To conclude, new technology advancement in photography technology can be judged as both positive and negative development. the former makes the past civilization more touchable and the latter may be fuel to change the reality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...both positive and negative development. the former makes the past civilization more...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, for example, such as, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26164874552 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05770271105 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605734767025 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7683599326 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.923076923 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157052360917 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541508052197 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058809270746 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103429464029 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471712626436 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.