A once threatful world is now turned into a safer place and expenditure going into equipping army should finish and not to proceed any more. I completely consent to other various alternatives to spend the monetary budget.
If the government is reluctant to ameliorate citizens' quality of life, it seems to lay the groundwork for the issue of age demographics, whereby young people is highly likely to bear the burden for an increasingly elderly population with high longevity. This may mean that the young generation will pay higher taxes and work longer hours even in the unsocial ones. The dire consequence of this is brain drain situation in which youngsters give their preference to migrate to the countries where this pressure is relatively low. In such cases, young ambitious people leave their country altogether, exacerbating the problem for those remaining. Thus, countries are liable to strive their utmost for societal betterment in order to preserve their country almost vital and mobile as much as possible.
In addition to this, a substantial proportion of people are exposed to existential threats such as famine, drought and outbreak of communicable diseases regarding their countries either developed or developing ones. These problematic issues are compounded by political instability, social unrest and the corruption of people in power which are able to be dangerous for residents' safety and subsistence. A good illustration of this is clearly delineated by Venezuela state where civil wars and social instability play a key role in reducing people's life satisfaction. In this case, the argument goes that the government should spend its budget to improve the social life of inhabitant rather than empowering its army as it doesn't work logically.
To conclude, I would embrace that there are far-more crucial matters that the government should highlight and that ones that can be challenging to rectify including improving people's life contentment as well as existential dangers relief.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 723, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...t rather than empowering its army as it doesnt work logically. To conclude, I would...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rectifying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: rectifying
...t and that ones that can be challenging to rectify including improving peoples life conten...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 224, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dangers'' or 'danger's'?
Suggestion: dangers'; danger's
...life contentment as well as existential dangers relief.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, regarding, so, thus, well, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37974683544 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92148772552 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629746835443 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.7309427486 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.666666667 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107232484836 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380407120845 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338653456074 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702177658211 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328599363541 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.