People have a different attitude toward about whether they should be live and work in horizontal cities or vertical cities. While some advocate to live and work can be more helpful in vertical cities, others dismiss them as a bad condition of life and work in horizontal towns. This essay will elaborate both points of view.
Surprisingly, the direct results of the ever-increasing population are often felt in framework of construction and building. As a result of unfettered growth of population is advent of vertical cities. This kind of cities are not only capable to accommodate more dwellers in own but also more affordable owing to optimized spaces. Lack of wasting time throughout daily commute is one of the other positive sides of such cities. Vertical cities or in another word, compact cities, in addition, by providing various facilities and services prevent literally from traffic congestion and also air pollution in order to find access to those. Furthermore, vertical cities are usually met the higher security.
In contrast, others put forward the argument that living and working would be more enjoyable in horizontal cities. The most axiomatic argument is that citizens deal completely with more open spaces, hence they can pleasure to look at the sky and stars at night or watch sunrise and sunlight every day because human need to visit beauty by nature. Living and working in a horizontal city is relatively less dependent on a lot of neighbours and cope with them which can be more persuasive. Lack of noise pollution also is one of the vital factors in living and working in a horizontal town.
To conclude, both of development have plus sides related to current politics in every society. However, I am of the opinion that horizontal cities allow inhabitants feeling freedom, alive and being energetic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...framework of construction and building. As a result of unfettered growth of popula...
^^
Line 5, column 572, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vital factors in living and working in a horizontal town. To conclude, both of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, so, well, while, in addition, in contrast, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11295681063 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75263153846 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58803986711 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4470933427 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.6 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222596279651 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756759565016 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546496012594 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136238038364 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493757525836 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.