By ever-growing population, lifestyle is dramatically changed and children tend to entrust their elderly parents in nursing homes. Although there are a cascade of downside attributes in caregiver homes, the benefits accruing to their residents are by no means negligible.
On the plus side, the advantages of lodging in nursing homes are manifold. To begin with, they are well-equipped and provide professional facilities to care about them. That is to say, they would facilitate the life for people residing in it by employing all-rounded personnel educating in the field of geriatrics. For instance, these employees know how can address the issues in emergency situations and recognize their needs. Along with this, care homes have an up-to-date system of medicine administration which means can keep in the record their rehabbing history as a reference.
However, drawbacks cannot be ignored. The most axiomatic argument is that ageing people in the care homes gradually start getting depressed owing to often their family members would not come back to visit them for even Christmas or Thanksgiving. Then they have a sense of losing their family function. In addition to this, these people, once in a while, are surrounded by sick dwellers, therefore, they are exposed to infection as a consequence of the weakened immune system.
To conclude, living in nursing homes would be both rewarding and problematic. While these institutions are taking care of elderly individuals by professional equipment and high-tech timely system of medicine administration, people's spiritual emotion put in pressure and endanger their health as a result of a disorder in their immune system.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'cascades'?
Suggestion: cascades
... in nursing homes. Although there are a cascade of downside attributes in caregiver hom...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43511450382 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00653872427 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614503816794 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9314291089 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.538461538 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268189738598 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842251808019 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573743667578 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152207152956 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289138010243 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.