It is often argued that people should take care of themselves to serve their personal health interests purposes instead of public responsibility. This interpretation can provide us with insights into the key role of health as the cornerstone objective in personal and social life. While I consent to the social implications of personal health, I opine that populace should maintain their personal health on the basis of some compelling reasons.
To begin with, the main reason for advocating health in favour of community is that individuals allocate their time and efforts for enhancing their health conditions in order to contribute as viable human resources to social betterment. To put it another way, regardless of countries security, they are bound to be protected from abhorrent conspiracies of enemy forces by well-qualified and strength-willed soldiers. For example, on account of constant training under a myriad of harsh condition, loyal and brave soldiers will be physically well-fostered to shield national security. Simultaneously, in good physical health conditions, citizens are more likely of the competence to devote themselves to social improvement throughout so long hours to work therefore increasing productivity. This in turn leads to development in the level of national and social.
Having said that, however, public interests are not the sole determining factor in this respect. The persuasive consideration basing personal benefits on personal health is that personal health condition lays the foundation of life fulfilment, which firmly endorses the viewpoint that people should reap the associated rewarding of this. By virtue of this, the more the populace are of a well-proportioned body, the more the rate of quality of life and a sense of life contentment is on the rise. A good illustration of this is clearly delineated by athletes who have the perfect insights into health conditions and adjust their daily diet appropriately. Such individuals are highly likely of a relatively high rate of life satisfaction thereby increasing their lifetime. Therefore, taking the advantages of personal well-being conditions are by no means negligible due to increasing life contentment.
To conclude, I personally take the view that citizens should take the maintenance of their health serious consideration as a benefit not only every single person but also the whole community.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2045.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54200542005 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21423152378 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566395663957 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8693797647 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.333333333 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147736848785 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522732633131 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514046860639 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10112719134 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289546157054 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.