The ways of offspring upbringing in the age of globalization and social relations have a vital impact on their ability growth. Some people believe that children should be allowed to make decisions about their own choices. Others contend that ability in decisions in the young ages impress on their personality in the future. This essay aims to evaluate both points of view and purpose a personal ability.
On the one hand, making a decision absolutely based on children's opinion and aspiration cause they would become selfish persons in the future. These selfish people when placed in a decision position, regardless of the others constructive or destructive ideas, do not have emphasized on the others people's idea. In this case, probable failure to decide will rise. Since their personality is going to shape as a despotic person, they often are incapable to abide by restricts and defined codes which there are in every society. For example, if such person engages as a company manager he/she can never capable to contact with his/her own board and staffs because of his/her despotic moral personality. A company without having a peaceful and collaborative atmosphere ho not achieve success. Thus, emphasizing on children's opinion can cause they do not learn how to get on with other people in the future and becoming selfish individuals as a result of the detrimental effects of it.
On the other hand, allowing children to make a decision has a great impact on their confidence and lead to rising it. Preserving child personality and acting into his/her ideas give to them acceptance and importance feeling. These factors both are of the growth operatives for personality and morality in children. In addition, children will gain personal independence and will become purposeful persons in their own society. Hence, allowing children for getting a simple and easy decision in childhood make them personality independence and high confidence due to the acceptance of them in the family. Also, there are discussions about personality structure as well.
Personally, I believe that shaping the identity of children is one of the most important parts in respecting children's opinions. If a child is capable to make a decision in childhood, consequently he/she can achieve the authority and choice power. Such a person can distinguish the bad and good aspects of the occurrence and decides based on wisely choices. For example, children are influenced by peer pressure and when a child be capable to recognize bad or good decision or act, he/she can become completely clever in that and avoids risk and guiltiness. Therefore, emphasizing and sometimes accepting children's decision help to improve their ability in forming their personality and lets would be flourished hidden talents.
In the end, children are considered as the future makers of a community. proper training and helping to grow their personality has a direct effect on their nation. However, although emphasizing on children's opinion can cause selfish and usually despotic persons, allowing them to make decision lead to forming their personality and rising confidence it children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 432, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[5]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are often
...ing to shape as a despotic person, they often are incapable to abide by restricts and def...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Proper
...ed as the future makers of a community. proper training and helping to grow their pers...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 10.4138276553 269% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2651.0 1615.20841683 164% => OK
No of words: 504.0 315.596192385 160% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25992063492 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84240508379 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474206349206 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 862.2 506.74238477 170% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8439027167 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.04 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.16 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233222948574 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745730610836 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847225039209 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154020272103 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046852072888 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.