Whether scientific projects should be conducted by the government or private sector has evolved as a contentious topic in government officials gatherings. While I consent to economic implication of being in charge of projects by private companies, I opine that societal effect should be taken into consideration as well.
To commence with, from the economic perspective, private sectors and commercial firms can lay the foundation to conduct scientific research due to their more expanded budget. This may mean that special budget need to be spent on scientific researches while government almost face financial constraints and is compelled to spend on more necessary basic requirement and improving infrastructure. In this situation, argument goes that the responsibility of launching projects might rest on the shoulders of private sectors directly. These project have far-reaching impact on companies' revenue if succeed. This in itself play a key role in stimulating and boosting economic vitality for commercial organizations.
On the other hand, turning to social outlook, setting scientific projects ought to be on the monopoly of the government because of national interests. Simply put, through launching such projects, it seems to be considered citizens' interests, thereby hopefully ameliorating people's quality of life. The effect of these projects by the government is bound to hold accountable for unmet demands of residents. A good illustration of this is clearly delineated by vaccination of Covid-19 pandemic by which the vast majority of laboratories strive their utmost to produce it under direct supervision of the state to be accessible by all. This in itself can lay the groundwork for improving life satisfaction and social life contentment.
To conclude, while I acknowledging the substantial role of private organizations in scientific researches development for that sake of their financial matters involved, I would embrace that conducting scientific project by the state not only does it stay focus on people's interest, but it also make an effort to improve people's quality of life through make it more available at ease.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eed to be spent on scientific researches while government almost face financial c...
^^
Line 2, column 573, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...ese project have far-reaching impact on companies revenue if succeed. This in itself play...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 20, Rule ID: I_AM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I am'?
Suggestion: I am
...l life contentment. To conclude, while I acknowledging the substantial role of p...
^
Line 4, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ic project by the state not only does it stay focus on peoples interest, but it a...
^^
Line 4, column 296, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
... focus on peoples interest, but it also make an effort to improve peoples quality of...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56402439024 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18891217216 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573170731707 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.6238024415 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.384615385 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2307692308 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61538461538 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21604957434 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760251409018 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525508239167 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13830767826 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412687715864 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.