The old tradition of a family having a meal together is disappearing. Why do you think is this happening? How does it affect individuals and the community?

Due to ever-developing technology, the cultural and social lifestyle fabric of people has literally changed. Family members no longer spend time together owing to various reasons. In this essay, the reasons for this problem as well as how the ill effects can be influenced social and individual aspects are intended to be discussed.

Surprisingly, the direct consequences of modernization are felt in people's lifestyle fabric. As a direct result of advancing technology is rising working time. Employees have to work for long hours and they often eat out, in their workplace or office whereas remains a little time to eat cuisine with family members. Moreover, the detrimental effect of developing technology such as smart phones or virtual games lead to various problems stemming from ill food behaviour and lack of appetite, in particular, in children. Another reason why having a meal together is disappearing is that cities expansion. Long distances not only do not allow employees and business owners to go home to eat food but also have relatively experienced the students in faraway universities to eat lonely for a long period of time.

The sustained expansion of eating isolation will make a marked impact on community and individuals in several dimensions. If one's continue to eat lonely, his/her interpersonal skills will be damaged. Such people cannot adapt with other members and from the social perspective, they often will involve in communication and eventually depression. Gathering family members not only help to survive tradition culture but also transfer this culture to the next generation.

To conclude, as more and more people consume food lonely for the sake of work or life conditions, new diseases ranged from mental to physical will appear which are as a result of changes in eating treats.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n are felt in peoples lifestyle fabric. As a direct result of advancing technology...
^^
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
...a meal together is disappearing is that cities expansion. Long distances not only do n...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 795, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...y universities to eat lonely for a long period of time. The sustained expansion of eating i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put between 'will' and 'involve'.
Suggestion: will often involve
...s and from the social perspective, they often will involve in communication and eventually depress...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, in particular, such as, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28865979381 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91291797115 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604810996564 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1076598763 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.928571429 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137075783331 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466796623396 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566014994565 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729296866225 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443313423267 0.056905535591 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.