While a number of people underscore the important role of government officials to cease criminal act, others advocate that preserving one's life and the asset is a personal responsibility. There are compelling arguments on both sides of this contentious topic which will be elaborated in detail, followed by my own take on the matter.
On the one hand, one cannot deny that there are those reasoning in which social safety is the cornerstone of a flourishing nation and therefore any development in this respect has far-reaching effects on other areas as well. That is to say, inextricably intertwined with other aspects of life, crime prevention is believed to be of central importance directly resting on the shoulders of government officials. This is amply illustrated by the fact that the lack of security in any society will automatically bring about diminishing international trade and interactions. Along with this, governments possess the most powerful means named social media accounting for a tool to increase social awareness. Moreover, another justification is that safety is one of the sole criteria for measuring success when it comes to achievements which the government is liable to provide the citizen with the number of accomplishments.
On the other hand, we should not lose sight of obvious role of individuals that making headway towards a high level of social safety and protection is a personal duty in this opposing view. The most rational reason for their assertion is that people should be introverted and avoid fleeting-anger. Practicing interpersonal skills is a personal responsibility and allow people to learn how they can control themselves throughout addressing a problem wisely. Failing to cope with anger, in the most case, would impinge anarchy and eventually unlawful act in which government would not play a pivotal role in reducing protection and safety. That is why it is an individual duty.
To conclude, there are valid arguments on both sides of the controversy; on balance, however, it is my firm conviction that crime prevention has to become a burden to the government since other citizens can improve their practical skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...al act, others advocate that preserving ones life and the asset is a personal respon...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, as to, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28818443804 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10836274581 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567723342939 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.4694141381 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.153846154 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6923076923 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24577223854 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772945732632 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465167099095 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13958486059 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247468747182 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.