The costs of public transportation in succession are on the rise currently. Although a multitude of causative factors could be accounted for in this trend, liable entities should come forward with viable solutions to remedy the situation effectively.
To begin with, the most axiomatic reason is that unfairly high in the cost of public transport as a social service is stemmed from fuel fluctuations rate at the global level. Simply put, the more one country depend fuel import, the more the nation is influenced by changing fuel price globally. This amply illustrated by the fact that the most country is bound to buy pricey fuel for importing thereby impinging on the public transport value as well to which are required to use fuel like oil. Another factor should be taken into consideration is to rely on public revenues as a dire consequence of imposing crippling sanction internationally. To put it differently, the government would set up some legislation within society on public services such as public transportation including train, bus, licensed taxis etc to increase the budget. Take Iran as the most patently obvious example in which all aspects of citizens’ life are under high pressure as a result of posed sanction including public transportation, because of falling foul of dealing Iran legislation.
However, there are a number of workable ways to cope with the occasion. Firstly, the government officials should dedicate heavily subsidy to the relevant companies in order to they can employ an alternative fuel in vehicles. Another alternative solution is relentless supervisions on the responsible persons to make a boundary for expending wisely in all essential sectors. Since economic corruption has been on the high rate, the problems would be tackled if the solutions have been implemented by the responsible entities.
To conclude, there are some valid reasons for this contentious topic. most countries are suffering from the high price of fuel as a result of the lack of oil sources and the shortage of state budget but by adopting rational solutions such as alternative fuel and administering budget can remedy the situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 71, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Most
...lid reasons for this contentious topic. most countries are suffering from the high p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, well, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2774566474 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00700841964 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580924855491 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8824263854 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.428571429 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143207849405 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491661552535 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300680180021 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839950185236 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280220901755 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.