Nowadays public transport prices are constantly increasing. Why do you think it is happening? How can this problem be solved?
There is evergrowing population in many cities worldwide. To serve people, administration everwhere is successfully implementing public transport systems. For the purpose of safe travel and time saving, general people have inclination to use such public transport. To keep the service upto date it’s a need of hour, to increase rates of such public transport. Further paragraphs will enumerate reasons for increase in prices and possible solutions.
Public transports have to keep their engines updated, pollution free, there is major cost involved in these updations. For example railway engines were shifted from coal to electricity in India. Within city area, buses are nowadays given a special corridor named as BRT (Bus Rapid Transit) For such corridor central road has been reserved with corridor on both sided and special stops. To such infrastructure upgradation, administration invest major funds. Similar is case for metro or monorail, there is huge investment required to make them operational. So all these investments and costs are recovered from public by way of increase in prices.
To avoid increasing such rates and burden on public, there are various solutions. Administration should earmark funds specially for public transport. Wherever possible, they should do tie ups with private companies and have a public-private partnership (PPP) Also they should divide their cost of investment in number of years and should have slow recovery to avoid huge burden on public. One more point should be considered is to do accurate planning. To illustrate avoid routes where there are no major requirement and save money.
To sum up, it is obvious that cost will be involved in implementing public transport in efficient manner, but such cost should not be immediately recovered from public, but various other means such as PPP should be looked into.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 366, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...ncrease rates of such public transport. Further paragraphs will enumerate reasons for i...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 504, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'requirements'?
Suggestion: requirements
...e avoid routes where there are no major requirement and save money. To sum up, it is obvi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40410958904 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89278776522 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595890410959 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.4148742293 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8235294118 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1764705882 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.29411764706 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145958065541 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483879288917 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393968751248 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994323800085 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304860657782 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.