Based on the provided evidence, a growing number of brokers tend to gather for their meeting and training through the social network, in particular, young business owners. Although there are cascades of drawbacks got involved in this trend, the advantages accruing to businesses are by no means negligible. Admittedly, I have an opinion that the online business agenda should continue owing to the compelling reasons.
On the affirmative side, the benefits of e-commerce setting on the social networks are manifold. To begin with, the most rational justification is that meeting and training and gathering e-commerce are by no means limited to time and place. That is to say, business developers do not substantially need to settle down in a particular office in order to arrange members meeting or agenda; considering that, using social network adopt their time to participate on adjusted meeting and no matter where they are or what time is. A good illustration of this is Digikala which is Iranian e-commerce based on co-operating with numerous stores from a Smartphone to clothing centers. Its founders clarify responsibilities at the kick-off meeting via online. Moreover, there is easily accessible to other members of a company in order to share findings.
However, the stumbling blocks cannot be ignored. The most axiomatic argument is concerned with the lack of creativity in online businesses which may be having faced with multifarious problems. Online meetings and training provided by e-commerce companies do not simulate a real office, hence, participators do not get the motivation to show off their creativities. Flourishing, therefore, online businesses tremendously find dependence on some individuals.
To conclude, I assert that online meeting and training is independent on not only where and when but also allocating certain location. Its advantages are twofold compared to the negative side which is the lack of stimulating atmosphere.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, in particular, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47368421053 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08896817347 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585526315789 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3439156168 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.933333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237615218008 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687939808691 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514704027481 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143299662418 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306530600233 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.