Whether deterioration of environment and shortage of accommodation should be brought into the focus of the state or not has evolved as a heated contentious topic. While I consent to the social and environmental positive implications, I think there is a range of equally pressing matters in this respect.
Those who place a premium emphasis on the state role in preserving the environment point to the need for upholding the minutiae of the humans' benefit. Simply put, environmental degradation reduces natural resources available, thereby putting in danger the humans' survival for successive generations. A large proportion of contaminations stems from human activities such as polluting factories or car emissions by which nature cycle is tainted and has a ripple effect. These toxic elements through water rain run-off enter the water cycle, by transferring through the water tables into aquifers, streams and rivers. If having been irrigated by these waters, agricultural lands will be poisoned and consequently, the soil will be damaged and other creature reliance on the water will be adversely affected. This, in turn, fuels communicable diseases and incidence of infections. Furthermore, accommodating the growing trend of the population prevents from constructing slums on the outskirts of contributions. Providing homelessness people with proper housing potentially improve social hygiene while hindering epidemic illness.
However, environmental and housing problems are not the only considerable factors in society. Joblessness is another rising challenging that should be taken into consideration equally. In other words, unemployment can potentially undermine everyone's economic prospects and consequent social mobility, especially at the time of economic instability and social unrest, as we can see in Iran. If having failed to pursue a career, it is highly likely, individuals will lose their life expectancy, resulting in psychological problems. The government officials, therefore, should zoom in unemployment to ameliorate citizens level of subsistence as well.
In conclusion, although it seems logical to me that the state should be liable for the environment and the people accommodation, the lack of job prospect should be regarded as at least important.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...vailable, thereby putting in danger the humans survival for successive generations. A ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 567, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ms. The government officials, therefore, should zoom in unemployment to ameliorat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, at least, i think, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77218934911 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27555948516 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639053254438 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6136927938 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.9375 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138746149545 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420731946656 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372109396139 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0807153838339 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00689827553707 0.056905535591 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 78.4519038076 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.