Once manual workers are now replacing by automatic equipment. While there seems to be undoubted positive developments involved, various negative ones stem from this too.
The highly presumable reason based on the positive outlook is to streamline the production, whereby facilitating prospects of the company's progression. Simply put, by putting into effect the sophisticated machines and high-tech devices, It is believed that progress of production will be enhanced, leading to higher levels of output and services. For example, manufactures equipped with high-tech sets can hold accountable to the rising demand of the market and become more productive. The other conceivable major positive effect is reducing the possible errors which may cause in manual labours. This, in turn, can inflict damage to the quality of products and impinge on the market share.
Turning to possible negative perspective, it seems likely that rising unemployment rate should be taken into consideration if manufacturers develop more automation systems. To put it differently, the more employing sophisticated devices, the less the companies require the manual workers which mean to cut the need for recruitments and human resources. A good illustration of this is clearly delineated by restructuring a company to make the best of the high tech devices. This company is bound to downsize and make redundant its workforces and change its hierarchy, thereby being made redundant its employees. Moreover, the cost of devices' maintaining is often of astronomically exorbitant, resulting in placing a burden to fix them. This, in itself, can put in danger of the firm's economic vitality.
To conclude, The machine-centric industry is intertwined with the positive and negative impact. The former makes productivity far easier and meticulous while the latter plays a substantial role in increasing the unemployment rate as well as the operational costs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Once manual workers are now replacing by aut...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, may, moreover, so, well, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59523809524 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15615652105 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8481945812 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.666666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169018963477 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511822418396 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398972741441 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931663258301 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02917612387 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.