Nowadays, more and more jobs and tasks are done by machines which involve hard physical work. Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects?
Technological advances introduce a revolution to companies. A huge variety of tasks are completed by machines, replacing traditional workers. In my point of view, this tendency leads to more positive effects than negative ones.
Firstly, mechanised workforce improves the efficiency of factories. Nowadays, most repetitive tasks could be done by automatic machine systems. Employees do not need to design and check products several times a day because the assembly line runs quickly and rapidly under the control of programme. In this situation, companies would produce more products with higher quality compared with outdated manual work. Thus, applying machines to basic works would enable the factory to be more efficient.
Secondly, expenditure on salaries could be saved for companies to advance cutting-edge products. Intelligent machines help employees finish some physical jobs, and also replace a part of workers. In this situation, the spending on salaries would be decreased for a factory and this money can be mainly invested in developing new products. For instants, Apple now introduces advanced mechanised assembly lines instead of employing human workforce. So, the company could concentrate more expenditure on researching hi-tech industries. Thus, using machines assists a company to develop further.
However, there still exists some drawbacks of applying machines to the company. The most obvious one is that this trend may lead to a high unemployment rate. Since most of the easy works are completed by robots, workers who do not master a personal skill may lose their jobs. In this case, governments would have a huge financial burden on supporting these citizens’ life. Therefore, replacing human labour with machines could lead to economic pressure on society.
In conclusion, the mechanised working environment provides more possibilities to companies. However, it would cause a negative influence on society. In the future, I believe that such issues could be addressed with the improvement of education and life quality.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62057877814 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93296944005 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614147909968 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.422968799 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.4545454545 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1363636364 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242265236278 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614012701362 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631190638043 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130992014872 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533970400466 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.72 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.