Some people think that computers and the internet are more important for a child's education than going to school. But others believe that schools and teachers are essential for children to learn effectively. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is argued that advanced technology such as internet and computer could give children a better education than traditional school. While in my opinion, I extremely disagree with this point of view.
Some people support that internet brings a global horizon to pupils, which help them to study kinds of knowledge without going abroad. The computer acts like a virtual museum that children can touch to any academic area just by searching. However, this comes to a problem that although internet shows a range of knowledge, it also contains violent and unhealthy news since it is limitless. These may have a negative impact on developing <span class="hiddenGrammarError" pre="on "></span>the psychology of children.
In this situation, I think traditional schooling may carry more weight than internet in children's study since professional educators can give system training to pupils. Most teachers in traditional school are well-trained and full of experience. Hence, they could sample a good model for children in such a sensitive growth period. Meanwhile, teachers could set a proper study plan to students, which protect children from the complex social environment.
Additionally, accepting education from traditional school is beneficial to children's communication skills. Unlike searching on the internet individually, the classic teaching method leads students to work with others. For example, there may have several group games during class. This kind of activity could build the bridge between child and counterparts, practicing their communication skills in an interesting way.
In conclusion, I support the attitude that traditional schooling method is more important for children's education compared with computer and internet.
- Some cities have vehicle-free days, when private cars, trucks, motorcycles are banned in the city center. Public transportations like buses, taxis and metros are advised. To what extent do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. 61
- Some people believe that in order to reduce crimes, prisoners should be given longer prison sentences while some people think there are other alternative ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- Some cities have vehicle-free days, when private cars, trucks, motorcycles are banned in the city center. Public transportations like buses, taxis and metros are advised. To what extent do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. 73
- Some people say that governments should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems to help people prevent illness and disease To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- Some people believe that in order to reduce crimes, prisoners should be given longer prison sentences while some people think there are other alternative ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 395, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an interesting way" with adverb for "interesting"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
..., practicing their communication skills in an interesting way. In conclusion, I support the attitude...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, may, so, well, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.56220296177 2.80592935109 127% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.642307692308 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8500654107 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.533333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293557219632 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937289152308 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826454439155 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179519598018 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747361323006 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.06 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.