While a number of people underscore the responsibility of government officials to cease criminal act, others advocate that preserving one's life and the asset is a personal responsibility. There are compelling arguments on both sides of this contentious topic which will be elaborated in detail, followed by my own take on the matter.
On the one hand, there are those reasoning that social safety is the cornerstone of a flourishing nation and therefore any development in this respect has far-reaching effects on other areas as well. That is to say, inextricably intertwined with other aspects of life, crime prevention is believed to be of central importance directly resting on the shoulders of government officials. This is amply illustrated by the fact that the lack of security in any society will automatically bring about diminishing international trade and interactions. Moreover, another justification is that safety is one of the sole criteria for measuring success when it comes to achievements which the government is liable to provide the citizen with the number of accomplishments.
On the other hand, the opposing view asserts that making headway towards a high level of social safety and protection is a personal duty. The most rational reason for their assertion is that people should be introverted and avoid fleeting-anger. Practicing interpersonal skills is a personal responsibility and allow people to learn how they can control themselves throughout addressing a problem wisely. Failing to cope with anger, in the most case, would cause anarchy and eventually unlawful act in which government would not play a pivotal role in reducing protection and safety. That is why it is an individual duty.
To conclude, there are valid arguments on both sides of the controversy; on balance, however, it is my firm conviction that crime prevention has to become a burden to the government since other citizens can improve their practical skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...al act, others advocate that preserving ones life and the asset is a personal respon...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, as to, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33762057878 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19282404321 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569131832797 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.8387292218 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.333333333 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9166666667 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264513601273 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821380175696 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536242824212 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14770610375 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277593818977 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.