These days, for teaching new knowledge to students, application of electronic methods instead of traditional methods is proposed to schools. Despite some benefits can be introduced related in following previous methods in schools, since this methods can be boring for students, I completely agree electronic methods are better way to give new information to pupils and thereby changing educational approach can be essential.
On the one hand, application of text books as main educational source may has both economically and practically benefits for schools. It can be more convenient due to having complete compatibility with the teachers. Most of the teachers have more hegemony over education based on text books than new methods, therefore they are interested to teach their students with traditional methods. Moreover, schools tend to save money and certainly application seem to be more affordable than application of “e-methods’’ like computers in classes. Certainly, it is costly to set up classrooms with facilities such as a TV, computer.
On the other hand, the main purpose of school should be bettering education to pupils. These days, even teachers believed their students get bored with printed books. According to the new researches reported by Cambridge in 2018, using games, computers and TV can be can be better ways to transferring new knowledge to students in schools.In this research, China schools ware examined and after removing text books in the primary schools, results completely showed that students ‘ enthusiasm to learning new educational contents has increased dramatically. The researchers think application of the methods suggested not only will be more attractive but also can be more informative.
In conclusion, with respect to traditional methods, I believe in our age, application of new methods like using computer and TV in giving knowledge to students can be better than previous method. I hope to see the better world with having more smart schools which can be practical with allocating more budgets to schools for preparing more up-to-date facilities and more training teachers related in new educational methods.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'school'.
Suggestion: school
...d of traditional methods is proposed to schools. Despite some benefits can be introduce...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...wing previous methods in schools, since this methods can be boring for students, I c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'can be'.
Suggestion: can be
... in 2018, using games, computers and TV can be can be better ways to transferring new knowled...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ng new knowledge to students in schools.In this research, China schools ware exami...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, such as, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53432835821 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20249401585 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525373134328 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.4739121781 49.4020404114 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.615384615 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7692307692 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121741575303 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512332729856 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0289233558603 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852868307141 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330372080948 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.