Some people think that the government should not give international aid since they have disadvantaged people like unemployment and homeless in their country.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Whether international aid should be deemed as a necessity or voluntary objective, especially when the giver country has been involved in joblessness and homelessness, has evolved as a heated controversial topic. While I consent to the political implication of international aid, I opine that the side effects of social impact should be accounted for.
Admittedly, the main reason for advocating international aid is rooted in the fact that it is set to help political issues potentially obviate. To put it another way, from the political perspective, there seems that humanitarian grounds lay the foundation to constitute the unity and relations between two countries. Irrespective of monetary or non-budgetary aid, humanitarian aids are bound to make an outstanding contribution to promoting international communication and cooperation. This in itself highly likely leads to reducing conflict among nations, thereby extending peace in the world.
On the other hand, it seems likely that international aids may in fact go beyond political consideration. from the social viewpoint, those who place a great emphasis on the lack of international aid point to the need for domestic help and support to improve their citizens' quality of life. Take into consideration a society in which the vast majority of citizens suffer from a high level of unemployment, the low level of literacy, lack of health and education facilities. In such situations, the argument goes, the government authorities should show sensitivity and lay the groundwork to address the existing problems in their own society throughout apportioning an ample budget. This in turn results in boosting life satisfaction as the minutiae of the community.
To conclude, it seems to me, both social and political outlook could be judged with references to international aid. Indeed, I agree with those who say that domestic aids are paramount, for the citizens' quality of life outweighs to the political image.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: From
...fact go beyond political consideration. from the social viewpoint, those who place a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, while, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46078431373 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27628518268 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584967320261 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8386131295 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.538461538 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145933003699 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519984197747 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333263045935 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905354737521 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187337975033 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.