In many nations, many people in huge cities either live alone or in small units, instead of in large extended family groups. Why is this? Is a positive or negative development?
A large proportion of people throughout the world, in particular urban dwellers, more tend to accommodate alone or in small units than ever before. I think the public is set to place a paramount importance emphasis on their own personal interests and pragmatic interpersonal skills and helpful can be stemmed from such a way of living.
The most axiomatic reason why people tend to live alone or in small units is mainly rooted in the concern that they place a great emphasis on their personal benefits. That is to say, people used to live in a community in which they were of the ethos of sharing and caring in relation to others, but nowadays, the vast majority of people is bound to pursue their own personal interests while preferring live lonely. A good illustration of this is clearly delineated by rural life in which all members of a family are highly likely to shoulder the certain and defined responsibility in the house. Therefore, on account of materialistic considerations, a number of people want to live separately from their extended family.
In my opinion, living lonely should be taken into consideration as a constructive feature in favour of persons. To put it differently, regardless of financial perspective which firmly the viewpoint that people lay the groundwork it for personal rewarding, learning how to deal with demanding situations in the real-life context. Such individuals are likely to display acumen in facing a dilemma due to devoting entirely themselves to develop their interpersonal skills. taking down-to-earth decisions in any momentous occasion is another merit of accommodating separately. This in turn leads to the increased the art of life in the level of personality and society.
To conclude, It can be advantageous for people who live lonely or in small units. I think it would be useful to improve themselves from both aspects not only financial status but also personality and becoming all-rounded persons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Taking
... to develop their interpersonal skills. taking down-to-earth decisions in any momentou...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, well, while, i think, in particular, in my opinion, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.146875 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0545032713 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1628175679 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.692307692 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6153846154 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17087879415 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589308663373 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534101968668 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963673406777 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512272640702 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.