It might seem logical at the first glance to agree with the mentioned assumption by which Happy Pancake House restaurant chains should extend the profitable change of replacing margarine with butter in other chains of restaurant throughout southeast and northeast. The author of this argument relies on what might be less credible or even unproven assumption to support his/her claim. Before the claim can be properly evaluated, however, some question must be answered.
Firstly, the argument depends on weak statistics. the author indicates that only 2% of customers complain about replacing butter with margarine, meaning that 98 of 100 customers are satisfied. some questions come to mind. Whether provided statistics have included all age demographics or contained only the young people or children. how many customers are total that 100 of them surveyed? it seems that the author is faced with potentially unrepresentative statistical results which are not significant in size. If so, then the argument would amount to especially poor recommendations.
Secondly, one more problem with the argument involves the author claims that customers do not complain when they order butter and receive margarine instead which can be as a result of whether they are not able to distinguish butter from margarine or refer to either butter or margarine. A question that involves the mind is whether they are loyal customers and are visible the vast majority of the time in the restaurant or just they are passers by who once come to eat something and never come back? Whether during passing the time the same customers return? If not, the argument would be lack any merit.
Lastly, the author argued that due to the lack of complaints about this type of profitable change, it is worth expanding it throughout the east and north of the country. the author should consider peoples' diet regarding their residential area. what if residents in other mentioned areas complain about this change and eventually ban going there locally? The restaurant is forced to endure bankruptcy. All of these questions deserve consideration before any final decisions are made regarding any type of change of food ingredients.
To conclude, despite the argument suffering from several problems and is unconvincing, we can not absolutely rely on or refute it without pursuing any additional assumptions and reasoning. the author can strengthen the argument by answering these questions above and offering more evidence. without these changes the argument is implausible and reasoning is faulty.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 50, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...he argument depends on weak statistics. the author indicates that only 2% of custom...
^^^
Line 2, column 193, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...that 98 of 100 customers are satisfied. some questions come to mind. Whether provide...
^^^^
Line 2, column 333, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: How
...ined only the young people or children. how many customers are total that 100 of th...
^^^
Line 2, column 389, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...rs are total that 100 of them surveyed? it seems that the author is faced with pot...
^^
Line 2, column 491, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: significant
...ative statistical results which are not significant in size. If so, then the argument would amount ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...hout the east and north of the country. the author should consider peoples diet reg...
^^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
... diet regarding their residential area. what if residents in other mentioned areas c...
^^^^
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...y additional assumptions and reasoning. the author can strengthen the argument by a...
^^^
Line 7, column 292, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Without
...tions above and offering more evidence. without these changes the argument is implausib...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 11.1786427146 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 55.5748502994 101% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2168.0 2260.96107784 96% => OK
No of words: 406.0 441.139720559 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33990147783 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83457196481 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 204.123752495 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.468620217663 114% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 705.55239521 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 69.1405324187 57.8364921388 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5454545455 119.503703932 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 23.324526521 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.70786347227 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.25449101796 171% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231778551745 0.218282227539 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571765594493 0.0743258471296 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082346152251 0.0701772020484 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117103047723 0.128457276422 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697046709588 0.0628817314937 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.3799401198 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.3550499002 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.5979740519 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 98.500998004 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 50, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...he argument depends on weak statistics. the author indicates that only 2% of custom...
^^^
Line 2, column 193, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...that 98 of 100 customers are satisfied. some questions come to mind. Whether provide...
^^^^
Line 2, column 333, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: How
...ined only the young people or children. how many customers are total that 100 of th...
^^^
Line 2, column 389, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...rs are total that 100 of them surveyed? it seems that the author is faced with pot...
^^
Line 2, column 491, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: significant
...ative statistical results which are not significant in size. If so, then the argument would amount ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...hout the east and north of the country. the author should consider peoples diet reg...
^^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
... diet regarding their residential area. what if residents in other mentioned areas c...
^^^^
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...y additional assumptions and reasoning. the author can strengthen the argument by a...
^^^
Line 7, column 292, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Without
...tions above and offering more evidence. without these changes the argument is implausib...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 11.1786427146 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 55.5748502994 101% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2168.0 2260.96107784 96% => OK
No of words: 406.0 441.139720559 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33990147783 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83457196481 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 204.123752495 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.468620217663 114% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 705.55239521 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 69.1405324187 57.8364921388 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5454545455 119.503703932 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 23.324526521 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.70786347227 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.25449101796 171% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231778551745 0.218282227539 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571765594493 0.0743258471296 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082346152251 0.0701772020484 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117103047723 0.128457276422 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697046709588 0.0628817314937 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.3799401198 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.3550499002 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.5979740519 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 98.500998004 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.