People will buy a product if it has quality or fulfil their needs There is no need for advertisement To what extent do you agree or disagree

Some People subscribe to the belief that buying products is based on fulfilling the need and how quality the products have and advertising is a part of the entertainment. While I consent to consumerism implication of advertising, I opine that people buy goods to fulfil their requirement, especially basic ones.
To commence with, it seems likely that advertising plays a crucial role in people's tendencies towards materialistic consideration. To put it differently, through changing people's attitude and shaping their thought, it is highly likely, advertisement encourages people to be consumerism. The effect of this persistent trend is flocking people to buy the whole range of goods that they don't really need them. In such situations, unscrupulous advertisers make an unnecessary need for consumers to encourage them to buy some certain products as we can see in the media about various products. This, in itself, might lay the foundation for the temptation to try these products.
On the other hand, however, the highly contingent reason is the issue of need fulfilment, whereby motivating people to obviate their requirement. Simply put, irrespective of products' commercials outlook, the more need individuals possess, the more products they buy. A good illustration of this is clearly delineated by hygiene goods that people have to purchase them without having paid attention to their advertisement. Therefore, special attention needs to be paid for removing the people's requirements because of their personal interests.
To conclude, While acknowledging the substantial role of advertisement as a motivating factor to buy the goods, I would embrace that persons purchase the products to remove their need.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 384, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... buy the whole range of goods that they dont really need them. In such situations, u...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, really, so, therefore, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51136363636 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20390736179 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1606255849 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.25 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37764707194 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141547903787 0.084324248473 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072838472847 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246290947058 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459991080072 0.056905535591 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.