There is an opinion among parents asserting that the emergence of bad demeanour in children can be stemmed from presenting a pricey gift to the children. These interpretations can provide us with insights into forthcoming issues relevant to social and personal problems. I completely agree with the given statement on the basis a multitude of compelling reasons.
To begin with, the main reason is that a sense of expectation is bound to appear in their personality which can be put under a microscope from both aspects of social and personal. To put it differently, from social outlook, inextricably intertwined with all aspects of an individual's life, it is believed to be the central importance when finding a job is concerned. A good illustration of this is such children who receive consistently expensive presents, place great emphasis on privileged work, while in the most case they do not deserve it. Therefore, retaining a stable job might be a demanding task as a dire consequence of a tendency to find a far-more better job.
Having said that, rising a sense of expectation is not the only negative factor in this defective circle. Another rational reason that should be taken into consideration from a personal point of view is that those children turn into a self-centred and materialistic person. Simply put, the more the costly gift children receive during their childhood from their parents, the more the children considered themselves as an admirable and precious one. Take a child from an affluent family receiving the expensive gift regularly as an obvious patently example; in their upcoming years, the child is highly likely to change his/her attitude toward other people trying to please his/her. They arrange their relationship according to people's financial circumstances. All provide these children with are materialistic aspirations.
To conclude, it is my firm conviction that parents should take some boundaries to present gifts to their offsprings. This is mainly because this trend can takes it toll on their personal and social development such as failing in finding job and becoming a selfish and narcisstic person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ably intertwined with all aspects of an individuals life, it is believed to be the central ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'take'
Suggestion: take
.... This is mainly because this trend can takes it toll on their personal and social de...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'tolls'?
Suggestion: tolls
... mainly because this trend can takes it toll on their personal and social developmen...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, therefore, while, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25797101449 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00371540566 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576811594203 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7033915591 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.933333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122717855354 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038914380386 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463832540399 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0798955819213 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301426306012 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.