Difference between countries is barely evident these days. Everyone in the world is wearing the same brand and watching the same TV channels and movies. Do you think it’s a positive or negative development?
Once strict boundaries between countries are becoming to wipe out now thanks to the globalization whereby people throughout the world are able to enjoy the same brand and the same TV programme. While I consent to the negative cultural implication, I opine that it is a positive economic development.
It must be admitted that those who place a great emphasis on preserving indigenous culture point to the need for maintaining the minutiae of customs of a society. To put it differently, it is believed that aboriginal culture is a cultural heritage arising from deep-rooted beliefs and time-honoured religious broadcast through TV programmes and films in the contemporary media-saturated society. Through exposure to TV programmes produced by alien cultures, people's beliefs and attitudes are bound to undergo a revolution, thereby fuelling culture shock. A good illustration of this is clearly delineated by Islamic countries where hijab is compulsory as a social norm. If over-exposed to western movies, it is highly likely that these people tend to flout the existing norms and defy the ground rules. This in itself inflicts damage on the fabric of society and social cohesion.
Globe trade opportunity, however, is an undeniable constructive outlook in this respect which firmly endorses the viewpoint that it could be a strongly positive development. This may mean that such multinational businesses make the vast majority of brands able to launch branches throughout the globe in order to sell their products more effectively. In another word, adopted countries are more likely to become economically motivated, therefore promoting job and economic prospects and consequent more social mobility. For example, Nike outlet brand set more than thousands of branches in the world creating ample job vacancies, especially for the young. Taking some advantages of products of diverse nationality while residing in your homeland can potentially make an emotional intimacy among people with cultural diversity and different ethnicities, laying the groundwork for world peace hopefully.
To conclude, I take the view that shrinking the borders between nations can be judged as both positive and negative developments as it can boost economic promotion as well as damage to the culture of the society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48033707865 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0574949149 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589887640449 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.433461281 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.357142857 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149881927923 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461487636259 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555104168507 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107705273093 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784210265533 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.