Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Language is both a paramount aspect of our everyday communication and the special attribute of each country, community or tribe. So, it is undeniable that out of diversity languages, which exists nowadays, few of them disappears annually. Divergent opinions arose about worldwide influence of extinction of number of languages on the international development: would it eliminate the difficulty of communication or vice versa has more negative results.
To begin with, it is apparent that languages help us with better understanding and deciphering centuries-long histories of nations and tribes. Cultural heritage conservation provides nations to maintain their identity and carry out intergenerational transmission of valuable knowledge and skills. Looking with detailed observation of rare languages, the fact is proven that multitude of significant knowledge could not be translated to common worldwide speaking languages, subsequently they would be lost irrevocably. Nevertheless, the extinction of few languages of minority no bring any changes to the whole world. For instance, such language as that is spoken by only one old lady in African village, or the language which is used by very 2 families in Ocean aria.
Besides this, today the trend of westernization of language nature, substituting majority languages with rather common ones as English, French and German, increases its popularity. Since business have developed on the international markets, prevailed number of deals used to be hold on English or Chinese far and wide. This plays crucial role in enhancing relationships amid countries and continents and improves the degree of complex interplay among nations, as the communication becomes easier. Moreover, utilization of strong variety of languages does not make culture conservation impossible. In opposite, all historical proficiency could be translated in order to simplify perception of future generations. Also, in conditions of modernization it is rather important to reinvigorate world culture with new ones.
To sum up, I reckon that the language disappearance is not the global issue, extremely required immediate solution. Conversely, it is inevitable process, that could be contributed with mankind, trying to maintain all valuable knowledge and evolving deeper translation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, conversely, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, for instance, i reckon, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1973.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80294117647 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33225169879 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635294117647 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1722657871 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.3125 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209854630772 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605030909267 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332340788019 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112679113699 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042109804545 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.