Over the past decade, the phenomenon of people have been an absolutely bad impact to environment has become prevalently and publicly in over the world. Although this may bring positively huge disadvantages, there are also some actually useful methods that both governments and individuals can take steps to solve this problem.
On the one hand, having a more and more developed economy, people have more hugely devastating effects on habitat by air pollution and dispose rubbish irresponsibly. In fact, by eating and travelling gets human exposed to many actions that enormously devastated the atmosphere such as gas emissions from kinds of vehicles or fume exhaust from factories. Such vomits will certainly not only seriously destroy the environment, but also having a really bad affect to human’s health. Besides, people nowadays have throwed wastes disorderly in almost places they set foot on, especially in famously tourism destinations where has tremendous number of tourist have been become a place of rubbish. For example, in several famous beach in Nha Trang and Vung Tau in Vietnam, it is really easy to find different kinds of wastes on them.
On the other hand, limiting and surmounting the bad impact of people to environment is certainly a task not only for the governments but also for individuals. Importantly, the government play enormously crucial role to help reduce the serious effect of crowds to environment by imposing immediately effective laws to limit the number of vehicles as well as reduce the phenomena of disposing waste disorderly. Furthermore, the governments could impose some regulations to having really appropriate fines for those did not execute the laws.
Paralleling with the governments, the individuals could partake their effort to protect the environment by enhancing their awareness of using reused or recycle bags as well as disposing rubbish into right places. In addition, by taking their hands in environmental volunteer organizations such as picking up wastes at along the beach or propagating environmental laws to rural and urban inhabitants are also the really useful ways.
In conclusion, if the governments and individuals could contribute substantially serious attempts as said above coincidentally, the return will seems to be a more plausible alternative for the environment to reducing the hazardous pollutant from people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, furthermore, if, incidentally, may, really, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2023.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45283018868 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07879960081 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587601078167 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.2730839122 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.615384615 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5384615385 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2307692308 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109679366018 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394190870064 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346842593571 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0628433625693 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319597600599 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.