Extreme sports such as sky diving and skiing are very dangerous and should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
In recent years, the question whether vigorous sports should be outlawed by government legislation has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although these sports do pose some potential risks, their advantages will justify these.
On the one hand, some reasons can be cited to support why the government should impose an official ban on dangerous sports. First, since the inherently dangerous nature of vigorous sports can threaten lives, they should be prohibited. In fact, players are prone to serious injuries, such as bone fractures, head trauma and fatal accidents, which is detrimental to their physical and mental development. Second, by participating in extreme sports, it costs participants a large amount of money. This means that participating fees and insurances are prohibitively expensive, which makes these sports become unaffordable for the majority.
Nevertheless, there are many compelling reasons why recreational activities should not be banned. First, the original purpose of these sports is training survival skills with a view to saving humans’ lives. For instance, it is necessary for pilots to learn how to parachute, and residents in heavy-snow countries, such as Eskinos, are able to move in these severe weather conditions, thus the practice of extreme sports should be permitted. Second, if people who take part adhere to the recommended safety procedures, the risk of accidents and injuries will be minimized. Plenty of sensible safety measures, such as safety ropes, helmets, brakes and even professionally qualified instructors, have been proven to mitigate the danger, thereby the prohibition of these sports is irrational.
In conclusion, although extremes sports run the risk of fatal damage, they should not be banned because of their benefits as well as the proliferation of protective equipment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-06 | Tường Vân | 84 | view |
| 2024-04-06 | Tường Vân | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | Ngoc4120 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-10 | tranlequihoang | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-12 | lariarhydes | 73 | view |
- The range of technology is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor To what extent do you agree 80
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The technology development has affected social relationships from person to person Do the positive aspects of this trend outweigh the negative aspects 89
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In some countries shopping online is replacing shopping at store Discuss both the pros and cons of this trend 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
In recent years, the question whether vigorous sports should be outlawed by g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, second, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56737588652 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00122369959 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631205673759 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4917384792 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.769230769 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252654800673 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836350222405 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389567698187 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149259423971 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256105073431 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.