Families who do not send their children to government financed schools should not be required to pay taxes that support universal education To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

Whether it is required to pay taxes that support universal education, for families do not send children to government-financed schools, is a controversial issue nowadays. In my view, it is not required and I believe that tax paying should not be taken into consideration.

In cases like wealthy families have always longed to offer children a prestigious school. These youngsters are supported with individual learning, enjoy both proper conditions and treatments at school. So, when people are affordable to costly private colleges, it is certainly acceptable to refrain extra taxes payment of local schools, which can do no benefits for sure. As we all know, parents desired to prepare their kids the best, by means of focusing the amount spent on the status and quality of college. It is no doubt that paying no taxes is reasonable, for the sake of children.

However, having said this, it must be admitted that what parents pay for is for teachers’ teaching to students. I am convinced that teachers are the one providing patience and cultivation to students, despite of students have areas of study improvements. Salaries should be paid to them, regardless of providing to school teachers. Their only payback is taxes which parents must be required to pay. Furthermore, families pay money in a good place. Tax payment is beneficial to the quality of life of the government, of the school, and of the students as well.

In conclusion, I certainly profess that parents should not be required to pay taxes, but on the other hand, it is open-and-shut that the teachers’ situation have to be considered and I do believe that taxes should be paid to them as reward.

Votes
Average: 4.7 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, in conclusion, no doubt, in my view, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04301075269 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04328726195 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8909013831 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.5 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367736398499 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119302324866 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095817931613 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238078484905 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101971107906 0.056905535591 179% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.