Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
It is undeniable that imposing taxes on parents who have sent their children to private school may be logically necessary, but I reasonably think that introducing high taxes on these parents is completely wrong.
Nowadays, optimistic parents tend to send their youngsters to private schools instead of public ones and incur vast expenses as tuition fees and direct high taxes, although I totally disagree with this type of regressive tax. The first reason is that private schools are extensively costly, and parents should not pay a cent more as a progressive tax for improving the education system. Generally, a private school is a relatively autonomous school, which is in no need for government money. These schools are only rely on the big money parents have to pay to cover their expenses. The second reason is that a private school’s expenditure hardly exceeds its income. These specific private sections usually have greater access to resources and technology than public schools. Therefore, parents don’t have to pay more than the prescribed tuition fees.
In my opinion, parents who send their children to private schools are already put to considerable expenses should not pay more money as taxes. In one hand, middle-class parents cannot bear huge costs. Ordinary parents want their children to study in a respected private schools and it is their right, but with its expenses, they give up and refuse to send their children to these schools. This irreversible decision may have devastating impacts on their children’s future. On the other hand, the taxes are directly introduced to public schools. In this case, it is better for parents to send their children to public schools rather than private schools. Because, their taxes will be directly spent on their children.
In conclusion, I believe that it is not wise to impose taxes on parents sending their children to private schools.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... and parents should not pay a cent more as a progressive tax for improving the edu...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more than the prescribed tuition fees. In my opinion, parents who send their ch...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22653721683 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72579143383 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498381877023 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4726101465 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.9375 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319099113654 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124537722988 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735205005699 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218288642063 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464551323435 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.