Female students prefer arts in schools and universities compared to those of male who tend to choose science. What are the possible factors behind this trend? Do you think this tendency should be changed?
The phenomenon on behalf of university and school entrance has occurred on which there is propensity among male and female students to enroll differently on science and art subject, respectively. This essay will examine some plausible causes of this, and present my opinion on the appropriateness of this trend.
Regarding the causes, the one possible is that subject chosen would be based on student interest as internal factor. This can be clarified in particular situation in which girls are fond of artistic matters and seem greatly able to express themselves. Secondly, students would enroll on course reflecting their personal characteristics. Example can be seen on boys who generally are mentally active and possess a great deal of energy, and this matter causes them to have the sense of Math or Physic. Finally, moving to the external factors, it is probable that students in some cases would be enhanced by their parents to plan the subject potentially beneficial for the future life. The reason is provided by the parent’s traditional conception in which the men who play a big role in earning money should pursue aim of undertaking highly-income works, such as doctors or banker, leading them to study at practical science in university.
By considering the causes explained, I am convinced that only when there is no external factors considered will the tendency of choosing subjects based on gender be more advantageous and unnecessary to be transformed. This is because it is essential that every student stipulate the internal factors, student interest and personal characteristic, on behalf of university or school entrance.
To conclude, the factors, leading students to have different tendency for selecting certain subject, are student interest, personal characteristics and parental encouragement. Hence, I would perceive that these factors aim to offer potential benefits and let this tendency become essentially existed.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, hence, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, in particular, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45214521452 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06910464573 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584158415842 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.2777696174 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.666666667 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273188401771 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968133433695 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464329752722 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175058270297 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470606250272 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.