Few languages are increasingly spoken in diffirent countries while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is it a positive or negative development?
Few languages such as English, Chinese, Spanish are becoming more popular all around the world, whereas other languages seem to be faded right in their own nations. In my opinion, I believe that this tendency has its own advantages and disadvantages.
On the on hand, it is certainly true that countries which use international languages as a official language have more chances to develop their economy via boosting multilateral trade. For an example, Singapore, at first just a small island, located in the Southeast Asia but all Singaporean are able to speak English fluently, so that they achieved such an incredible growth and have become a nation with cultural diversity so far. Secondly, Speaking globe languages help countries using them appeal a huge of tourist because it is easier for overseas visitors to communicate with local people. For instance, most of Filipino have ability to speak English as their mother tongue. Therefore, the number of foreigners coming to the Philipines is nearly twice as much as higher than that of other nations in the same areas.
On the other hand, the gradual disappearance of other languages definitely do harmful to the society. First of all, losing the traditional languages is synonymous with losing a strong sense of identity, then the young generation would not know about their original. National languages provide a link to people’s roots. Therefore, without national langues, people tend to dismiss the traditional values and this one leads to an embarking situation that the cultural activities, national costume and all the things belonging to tradition will be forgotten.
In conclusion, while I accept that it would be more beneficial for people to speak international languages but I still suppose that the national languages should be cherished and not be forgotten.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-27 | bminhanh01 | 67 | view |
| 2019-02-27 | bminhanh01 | 67 | view |
| 2016-10-31 | catus | 89 | view |
- Early technological developments helped ordinary people changed their lives more than recent developments. To what exent do you agree or disagree. 84
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attraction. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 73
- Many people say that family is the most powerful influence on a child’s development. However, some people suppose that other factors (such as music, friends,…) have a great influence on children.” Discuss both views and give your opinions. 84
- In many schools and unversities, girls tend to choose arts subjects (e.g languages) and boys choose science subjects (eg.physic). What do you think are the reasons? Do you think that this tendency should be changed? 84
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life, but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can government make urban life better to everyone. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...es which use international languages as a official language have more chances to ...
^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onging to tradition will be forgotten. In conclusion, while I accept that it wo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29351535836 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88358137156 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597269624573 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8208439925 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.25 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1666666667 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140724947546 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550280404809 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509144127192 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0874909515825 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00892350208686 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.