Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis. What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking?
These days, people tend to use their own vehicles to go to the workplace instead of walking that they would suffer from late. From my perspective, I claim that some measures can encourage citizens to walk as a part of their daily basis.
Overall, there are several reasons why it has happened. In the first place, living in the fast-changed of world, people have a number of vehicles that offer them to go to the company quickly. Thus, more and more residents have changed their habits, driving own transport or public transport is more popular because it is convenient and allows people to save a huge amount of time. To take my dad as a demonstration, instead of walking to the workplace, he regularly took a bus to work, it took him only 30 minutes, it was faster rather than walking. However, it causes him to become lazier. Moreover, what is mentioned is that people do not become aware of the benefits of walking. With the development of the world, lots of countries could manufacture cars or motorbikes and use them as a big part of their daily routine.
There are some approaches that could be carried out to encourage citizens to walk on a daily basis. The firts way could be that the governments are expected to build some ample spaces for pedestrians, such as parks or squares, It is also a good way to encourage citizens to walk more often. Furthermore, the most important thing could be that the governments are supposed to make the best use of their power to raise residents' awareness by giving them the merits of walking regularly. To take my country, as an illustration, the local authority has organized the meeting to introduce the positive aspect of walking, such as it could lead people to be healthier, enhance health as well as keep fit.
To sum up, some areas why people are walking less regularly can be identified and the governments should action some simple solutions to encourage them to walk more frequently.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, such as, as well as, to sum up, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73235294118 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67591299945 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520588235294 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6335696055 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.928571429 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275360462198 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924045134664 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549138319052 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177527208535 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220496744349 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.