The flow chart illustrates the consequences of deforestation. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The flow chart highlights the severe impacts of deforestation in various aspects
In general, the main consequences of deforestation could be divided into four immediate effects, which ultimately lead to 2 major pernicious outcomes in the long term.
As can be observed from the chart, clear-cutting of forests results in heavy logging tools and equipment compress the soil with the aim of making it hard and baked. Because of that, rainwater runs off these soil without any difficulties and this is greatly attributed to devastating floods
At the same time, there are 3 other hazards resulted from deforestation namely reduced roots in the forests, increased risk of burning as well as less moisture was returned to the air. Interestingly, they all introduce pioneer species while the vegetation is reduce downgraded, which is reportedly responsible for the deterioration of biodiversity. To be specific, since there are merely a few roots remain, topsoil is less likely to be held in place and, therefore, soil erosion is inevitable. Concerning the climbed number of forest fires, which can be caused either accidentally or intentionally, it goes without saying that waste woods from logging is eliminated and so do the microorganisms relied on them. Last but not least is the decrease in the amount of moisture produced by plants. This phenomenon is synonymous with less precipitation and, consequently, droughts hit us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 260, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'reduced'.
Suggestion: reduced
...pioneer species while the vegetation is reduce downgraded, which is reportedly respons...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, so, therefore, well, while, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1208.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 226.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34513274336 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15157332791 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.690265486726 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.9611384445 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.0 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0993087464841 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361914789214 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552242872914 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0825323682252 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531564888085 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.