Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the modern era, the number of cultural and historical attractions in various regions had increased significantly. These conditions occurred as an implication of lower cost policy which keeping by most of airplane companies, then it motivated most of foreigners to trip from one state to another regions. In another word, the cheapest prize of airplanes which were used by foreign visitors also has implicated to the growth of cultural and historical events in numerous countries. Although, some countries were utilized the number of foreign visitors to expanding amount of tickets for foreign visitors.
I my own opinion, I would like to disagree to the policy which were made the foreign visitor should pay more than local visitors. The same standard of prices among local and foreign visitor would give more than benefit and positive impact then the policy of unequal prices. Even though the policy of foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors implicated towards the increasing of foreign exchange slightly, however it just incidentally as well as un durable. Furthermore, it also were gave more negative views by foreign visitors.
There are two kinds of positive impacts, i.e, getting more positive response by foreign visitors and it were implicated to increasing the number of foreign visitors, by evolutionary it could be enhancing state’s foreign exchange by establishing a bunch of services such as accommodation, hotel, tour guides, as well as tour guides for visitors.
To sum up, the equality of attractions prices were gave incredibly positive impact then another.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the foreigners') or simply say ''most foreigners''.
Suggestion: most of the foreigners; most foreigners
...f airplane companies, then it motivated most of foreigners to trip from one state to another regio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unt of tickets for foreign visitors. I my own opinion, I would like to disagr...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'given'.
Suggestion: given
...s un durable. Furthermore, it also were gave more negative views by foreign visitors...
^^^^
Line 9, column 52, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'given'.
Suggestion: given
...the equality of attractions prices were gave incredibly positive impact then another...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, incidentally, so, then, well, as to, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38888888889 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83915191082 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531746031746 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.8677196074 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.8 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332497478108 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146373782684 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103678661333 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171616871733 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134203786756 0.056905535591 236% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.