There appears a fact that several countries are setting their sights on more sustainable sources of energy, unlike other nations who are burning coal, oil and natural gas as the main fuels. Although some detriments seem to remain, I believe that this tendency is more of a positive change.
On the one hand, I accept that countries pursuing alternative energy sources may encounter a few constraints at first. Given that fossil fuels are naturally available, exploiting these resources is much more accessible and lucrative. In contrary, seeking new sources of energy is more costly since countries would have to develop technologies along with investing in installing equipment to harness such that energy. For example, wind turbines or solar cell panels are all of prohibitively expensive that hinder any nations dreaming of renewable energy. Moreover, the existing technology to yield energy from sunlight is working inefficiently, as low as 1% of the solar energy transformed into electricity. In another word, attempts to use alternative resources may initially spell troubles since countries have to deal with the dearth of energy.
However, I would convince that switching from fossil fuels to renewable energy can result in an optimistic outlook. Beyond the arduous initiatives, these nations gain access to sustainable sources of energy, which ensures the future demand for electricity. Meanwhile, coal, oil and natural gas are exhaustible and being reported depleting swiftly; hence, fossil fuel-dependent countries may eventually turn to the inevitable decision of the greener resources or would not otherwise end up energy-deficient. More importantly, alternative energy is eco-friendly since the harnessing processes scarcely emit greenhouse gases, which are produced tremendously when burning fossil substances.
In conclusion, while there remain several obstacles that nations using alternative energy have to manage, I maintain that they are embarking an advantageous development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79391891892 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06627063606 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608108108108 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.584879155 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.923076923 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298893515738 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991164013421 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480494338006 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165578316076 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521629126404 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.