There emerges a tendency that media reporting set primarily its sights on anarchy and emergencies without mentioning social improvements. From my perspective, I agree that this trend may spell trouble for every citizen as well as society.
On the one hand, it is indisputable that that media's preference can bear a few positive effects on individuals and society. Individuals who informed about instabilities and emergencies may be more proactive and facilitated to safeguard themselves from those problems. For example, bombarded with news regarding infectious outbreaks on the media, people are prompted to protect their health by refraining from going to crowds. Moreover, the pressure derived from media reports, coupled with the concerns of society about social problems, draw the government’s attention and coerces the government to take actions to address those conditions. Hence, this inclination of news reporting, to some extent, can be acceleration for stabilising society.
However, only turmoil makes front-page headlines without reporting social advancement would be rather destructive. Any Individual living in a society that is full of crisis and instabilities would certainly be frightened, discouraged and even aimless in life. Indeed, people find no motivation to study or work if they are unceasingly informed that they are not protected from terrorists, natural crisis or economic downturns. Furthermore, broadcasting too much about criminals and anarchy may unconsciously, but potentially, spur violence and social disorders, which may ruin the social fabric. Finally, administrative bodies, like authority, medical and security system, appear to be demotivated since their efforts are not appreciated and praised, thus eventually exacerbate the problems.
In conclusion, while media has crucial roles in helping individuals and society to be informed and prepared with negative developments, I would argue that pay too much attention on that without looking into bright sides is rather detrimental.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 37, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
... On the one hand, it is indisputable that that medias preference can bear a few positi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85858585859 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15704642803 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639730639731 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4416250167 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.846153846 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160377812361 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556714648608 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337115847157 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994558367269 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305421757236 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.