Regarding the knowledge that students should be taught, some held the point that they should focus on academic subjects to surmount exam, while soft skills like cooking or dressing are unnecessary. From my perspective, I strongly disagree with that view.
To begin with, I affirm that academic education is vitally important to the future of the students. Knowledge from disciplines, such as physics, math, chemistry, is not only the basic understanding of the surrounding world but also the chance for students to reinforce their brain’s abilities. That is why academic subjects cover most of the conventional education levels.
However, I would protest if this theoretical knowledge is taught to merely serve the purpose of overcoming exams. With the purely aim at the academic result, students may find the academic knowledge not worthwhile and these understanding soon becomes eroded. Instead, those who involving education system should instil students with the meaning of studying academically and applying them in real life.
Moreover, I oppose the position that skills like cooking and dressing should be out of the curriculum. Firstly, these soft skills may help students to be more self-reliant and even gain a feeling of life satisfaction. For example, those who equipped with practical skills like cooking can take care of themselves on everyday life; culinary practising can also be refreshment after working hours and therefore, helps to strike the study-life balance. In the long run, other skills are of subtle but crucial roles to play in the working life. Choosing clothes is a case in point, that employees in varying professions, especially prestigious ones, necessarily need to take into account. Thus, those skills should be included in the educational curriculum to provide students with comprehensive knowledge.
In conclusion, it seems to me that students should be taught not just academic knowledge, for understanding and applying them in life, but simultaneously soft skills to best equip them with accomplished repertoires for their future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46728971963 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96142583777 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576323987539 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5101471675 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354249460613 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114655904082 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10511228048 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205702987552 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103537992483 0.056905535591 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.