Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking or dressing should not be taught. To what extent do you agree/disagree?
It is believed that students are of academic education acquisition to overcome the terminal tests at school while regarding such soft skills as doing housework, cooking or dressing, there is no room in school curriculum. From my personal perspective, I strongly disagree with this opinion and in the following paragraphs, several reasons will be put forward to prove my opinion.
First of all, it can be undeniable that theoretical knowledge is of importance and plays an indispensable role in study. If academic knowledge accumulation is poor, it can be hardly conducive to the positive performance in the tests or exams at school. In the long run, it is more likely to become a barrier for students to reach higher career ladder because of lack of strong premise from a very young age. As for students who have obvious orientation of such theory-required jobs as teachers or doctors in the future, being equipped themselves with academic background is the necessity.
However, it is obviously an insufficient provision if a myriad of practical skills, for instance doing housework or cooking, is exclusive in school curriculum. So crucial for students such skills are equipped as soon as possible that those are the necessary tools to encounter the hard obstacles in life. For example, when students make a decision to live apart and have their own life, they have to take adaptation to a new one without any assistance from parents. Nevertheless, it comes as no significant difficulty if the capacity of cooking and arranging living space by themselves have been taught earlier at school.
In conclusion, soft skill courses are not less crucial than academic knowledge provision. Therefore, I believe those should be inclusive in the schooling.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, while, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19366197183 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0041526341 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605633802817 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8489775355 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.916666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267601211448 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894803233491 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442450316615 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15340015462 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316723884358 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.