Some people think that sending criminals to prison is not effective. Education and job training should be used instead. Do you agree or disagree?
In the recent decades, it has been believed that educational provision and job training should be the replacement of imprisonment which is considered as an inefficient way. From my personal perspective, I strongly disagree with this opinion and several reasons will be put forward in the following paragraphs to prove my point of view.
On the one hand, I concur that educating awareness and providing job training can be one of the effective ways to this issue because it is likely to be an exposure of humanitarianism which is fair to every citizen. More specifically, in several special cases, juvenile curbs the delinquencies at a very young age as a result of being induced by peer although I believed that in the depth of mortality, they are not naturally bad. Youngsters mostly perform a poor awareness of the consequences of an unlawful act they committed. Therefore, educational and occupational programs are needed to encourage them become a different version of themselves and well prepare for community reintegration into community after being released.
On the other hand, I also have a strong belief that prison sentence plays an efficient role in punishing the offenders who commit a heinous crime such as serial murder, sexual assault. This retribution is regarded the price criminals have to pay. It also serves as one of the embodiment of justice and fairness as well as allows them to rethink about their lawbreaking. In the considerable run of imprisonment, it is more likely that they will show the signs of sincere repentance.
In conclusion, two measures have their own effects. Therefore, I believe that lawmakers should be taken the combined penalty into consideration to demonstrate the best efficiency.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19572953737 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11409251937 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612099644128 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1901872011 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.666666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15069892009 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472924684297 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510266384569 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856890582271 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044948560908 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.