At this moment in time, in contemporary cities, gas fuel consumption are used more than enough and prone both people’s health and environment into many severe circumstances. To cope with these problems, government provides useful approaches in order to restrict natural fuel’s usage and try to tend people to use harmless energies such as solar, wind, etc. . From my point of view, although this perception has either pros and cons, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
First and foremost, one of the most effective attributes is about the culmination of replacement. Indeed, taking care of teenager’s health and trying to elude from diseases which come from natural gases is so vital. In addition, an impressive contribution among nations in order to put a compulsory lesson at high school about the benefits of this replacement would have a fascinating impact on scholars. Furthermore, future will be stimulated if the use of natural gas is decreased. By this solution, an optimistic view about following time will be appeared.
On the other hand, the principle issue with this feature is lack of ingredients as well as well-educated persons in order to go through this situation and do. That is, development of this idea needs a full knowledge about how tools are put up and also a well-done regulation about every single part of this construction. Some of outdated countries are devoid of any of these criteria. Furthermore, full consensus has been available between authorities in which erecting this idea stems from a huge amount of finances and the point is these countries can’t afford to put a budget on it.
Overall, it is evident that if world wants to maintain solar energy, first infrastructures have to be sturdy and sustainable. All in all, a useful compromise should be existed about aiding to poor countries to stay in credit and remove hurdles in order to achieve goals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...mless energies such as solar, wind, etc. . From my point of view, although this pe...
^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: OF_ANY_OF[1]
Message: Consider simply using 'of' instead.
Suggestion: of
.... Some of outdated countries are devoid of any of these criteria. Furthermore, full conse...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, well, in addition, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12820512821 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97342322924 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63141025641 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7339474924 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.285714286 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215016794447 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067093699184 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065813599734 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123790101302 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075906616805 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.