Fossil fuels, such as coal, oil and natural gas, are used in many countries. The use of alternative sources of energy, including wind and solar power, is encouraged. Is this trend is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, many countries have seen the rising popularity of applying alternative resources, like wind and solar energy. In my opinion, this exerts a positive impact on human life and the environment. Analyzing its considerable advantages and comparing them to those of fossil fuel will show this.
First, alternative resources assist countries with ensuring energy security. In fact, nations have anticipated problem about the energy supply in the future. Indeed, fossil fuel like coal, oil and natural gas, formed by an accumulation over thousands of years, have a limitation and will run out despite people’s great demand on energy. Hence, alternative resource, which is renewable and unlimited, can be a potential measure against this challenge. Furthermore, thanks to their balanced distribution, wind or solar power facilitates exploiting limitless in every country. This helps nations having lack of natural resources reduce fossil fuel imported from others. In other words, the ability to serve infinitely, preventing countries from relying on others is the major strength making alternative resources become trendy today.
Last but not least, it is needed to point out renewable energy’s advantages to protect the environment and human life. Specifically, using them does not emit a huge amount of harmful gases, carcinogen substances, or volatile organic compounds, which are produced by those of fossil fuel, as we see in countries like China or India. As a result, local people are less likely to suffer from disease or syndromes diminishing their health.
To sum up, renewable resources should be encourage more strongly because of its pluses to be exploited infinitely and protect the community against many health risks. It is not only an ideal choice but also a proactive measure that countries need to take, aiming to tackle pending environmental problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, many countries have seen the r...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o those of fossil fuel will show this. First, alternative resources assist coun...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rnative resources become trendy today. Last but not least, it is needed to poin...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or syndromes diminishing their health. To sum up, renewable resources should be...
^^
Line 4, column 44, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'encouraged'?
Suggestion: encouraged
...o sum up, renewable resources should be encourage more strongly because of its pluses to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... tackle pending environmental problems.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, in fact, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53287197232 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91294819355 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650519031142 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.51483547 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.6 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182772641195 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053482314399 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473901372191 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986182747057 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693132042441 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.