Social media is becoming increasingly popular amongst all age groups. However, sharing personal information on social media websites does have risks.Do you think that the advantages of social media outweigh the disadvantages?

Nowadays, according to statistics and facts, the usage of social media has been dramatically rising specially between teenager and youths. Despite the fact that using of social media is pleasurable, it will have a destructive effect on life privacy. In this essay both pros and cons will be explained.

First and foremost, a fully consensus has been available about social media in which some types of it have an impact on both technic and scientific informations. Indeed, several well-educated persons have a firmly impression on lifespan improvement as well as foster the principal way to live as well as than they were used to. One obvious positive attribute of social media is maintaining people’s connection. Furthermore, a distance between humans isn’t be conspicuous and also it has been widespread among all types of group ages in order to interact with everyone.

It stands to reason that sharing private informations lead anyone to have a bad consequence. The main disadvantage of social media is misusing of private data. For instance, a sophisticated cooker may share some important instructions and an opportunity will be made for someone who is enthusiastic about cooking and regards it as a valuable accomplishment. Hence, it has a collapse effect on the way he/she works. Another disadvantage of social media is some sorts of data are not suitable for children and they have a fully access on this information. Consequently, they face with inappropriate data and prone to be provoked not only about their action, but also a serious fundamental change about their behavior will be occurred which puts a strain for the rest of their life.

Overall, going under the surface, the disadvantages of social media are more than the advantages and the most vital responsibility is going back to the government which has to cope with these bad circumstances and try to restrict harmful effects of social media.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('fully') instead an adjective, or a noun ('consensus') instead of another adjective.
...ll be explained. First and foremost, a fully consensus has been available about social media i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('firmly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('impression') instead of another adjective.
...eed, several well-educated persons have a firmly impression on lifespan improvement as well as fost...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 519, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('fully') instead an adjective, or a noun ('access') instead of another adjective.
...not suitable for children and they have a fully access on this information. Consequently, they...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, thus, well, as to, for instance, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18530351438 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07480725732 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568690095847 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6461263824 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.928571429 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304049382621 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113330409363 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0958077373639 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195564864303 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324636336492 0.056905535591 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.